14 March 2007
GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE, THE BULLETHOLES DO
.jpg)
RIFFMARKET TO RELAUNCH AS REMIX WEBSITE
"I WILL REMIX ANYTHING--ANYTHING" HE SAYS
ALL REMIXES FINAL
Sorry to beat Status Ain't Hood to the following sentiment--I'm sure you were looking forward to his "Remixes: Please Break Up" headline as much as I was--plus I like to think I'm as much a save-the-sample frontliner type in the war against creatively inhibitive copyright as the next halfassing blogger, parents just don't understand and all that, but: YIKES. This is just a waste, in service of I don't know what, and the worst part is people actually like it.
Months ago I was talking to Elliot about the energy of this new-rave / franco-filter-metal / Edbanger-Institubes / joycore-remix-mashup-mp3mixtape / bloghouse scene, how indie rock had ceased to be participatory and how extremely participatory the bloghouse scene was in contrast. People are not only listening and then telling all their friends how awesome everything is, but now the technologies are so cheap and easy to use that they are actively modifying the music, chopping it up and blending it and sending it to Discobelle with no small hopes of online bigtime. The entry-level audio technologies people are using too aren't that far off from the popular blogger softwares if you think about it, your Bloggers and Livejournals and Typepads and to a lesser extent Wordpresses that more or less automate the process so you don't have to learn CSS styles and PHP, i.e. all you need to do is shit out your text and hit publish, with no understanding of how that text is manipulated to appear on the screen before you. So the speed with which these unofficial remixes are coming about, it's just unbelievable, and somewhat of a dare too, i.e. if you're really so into Digitalism, why haven't you remixed them yet?
Let me just say again that I find all this really exciting in principle, really awesome too to see this sort of interaction serving as an outsiders gateway into dance music. And maybe the obvious decision to make here is just stop listening to all the awful remixes that glut the internet, that speed up the rate of audio consumption, i.e. it's not like these remixes are actively destroying the originals, though admittedly sometimes I feel that way, e.g. Diplo's "Someone Great"/"My Love" mash. But come the fuck on! This is the Internet! All of us--me, you, everybody--have a duty to find things, and have opinions about these things, and give these things arbitrary numerical values, as quickly and as often as possible.
So! My guess is most of these remixes, most of which are awful, are in fact fan-generated, i.e. executed by people self-trained technically and musically, who have an "ear" for things and trust their ears in composition, but most importantly trust their technologies to do most of the heavy-lifting for them: pitchmatching, beatmatching, providing with soundbanks and loops and the ability to tweak these loops within audible parameters, etc. More like babies dressing up Barbie dolls than a different babies playing with Lego bricks, and that is no slight to either, i.e. all my Barbie-playing baby readers, I want absolutely zero shit outta you.
Where I'm going with this is more of a question, and my own kind of dare, to keep kids off remixes obviously but something more than that too hopefully, which is: you'd think people would be embarrassed to put some of this remix stuff out there in the condition it's in, more a collection of preset and loop dressing than any purposeful reconsideration of a tune. Plus I imagine we'll get to the point that these fans aren't even technically the "remixers"--they are merely the vessels through with their entry-level audio software programs are expressing themselves. I'm sure the savvier among you can already spot these earmarks pretty quickly actually.
Like hell I'm going to tell people to stop participating with the musics they love; there are already enough permanently worthless cranks out there who, in between self-loathing cracks about the size of Ultragrrrl's titties, are complaining about everything all the time anyway. More a phenomenon I'm generally interested in, manifesting itself in a young person's culture, etc., i.e. when technology moves from superstar enabler to superstar itself, from aiding art production to crippling it. You know me!

50 RIFFS
Download: Jackson Jones' "I Feel Good, Put Your Pants On" (Pilooski Edit) [zshare]
Labels: copyright, dance, internet, music, remix, technology
Comments:
<< Home
Nah dude, this "Us v them" remix is fucking tits. done by a mash-up guy. so underground. so indie. indie=pure. you got something against purity? be careful people might start to think your anti anti-gay. it's like how that Zak remix of "Mr. Me Too" was so much better than the original. that pharrell verse, garbage. and the remix has horns man. i don't hear any horns in the original. clearly you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. like that villalobos remix you hyped some weeks ago, that's like 13 minutes of the same shit, sans horns. please, leave this stuff to the pros, and stick to writing about jaromir jagr.
right, but this whole thing has happened before,
big labels have market on lockdown ==> indendents spring up in reaction ==> countless shitty get recording contracts, all the indie baggage ==> we get Deerhoof and Animal Collective
orchestras cost way lots of money ==> we build synths emulate ==> no way midi can touch the original ==> we get New Order
writing a song is fucking tough ==> djs get paid b/c no one likes the shitty house band ==> djs become superstars, drive house (dj-style) into the ground ==> we get Daft Punk
recording costs a lot ==> computers make it cost almost nothing ==> even cheaper software lets more shmucks in, making way more and way worse music faster ==> but there's gonna be some kids who will fucking rock it and got there b/c of bloghouse shenanigans
big labels have market on lockdown ==> indendents spring up in reaction ==> countless shitty get recording contracts, all the indie baggage ==> we get Deerhoof and Animal Collective
orchestras cost way lots of money ==> we build synths emulate ==> no way midi can touch the original ==> we get New Order
writing a song is fucking tough ==> djs get paid b/c no one likes the shitty house band ==> djs become superstars, drive house (dj-style) into the ground ==> we get Daft Punk
recording costs a lot ==> computers make it cost almost nothing ==> even cheaper software lets more shmucks in, making way more and way worse music faster ==> but there's gonna be some kids who will fucking rock it and got there b/c of bloghouse shenanigans
andrew thanks for comment, we're in agreement in terms of overall positivity but it's a lot to deal with in the present tense, plus all your causes/effects imply some never-going-back forward motion that i don't necessarily agree happens. then there's just that much more of the stuff too, given the internet's tendency to favor the vocal minority's version of reality. in all your other examples, nobody was learning on the job like people are today
don't know if the thing i just sent went through. if not:
i like your point about learning on the job. it makes me appreciate the music business-as-filter a little more. it also makes me wonder who's actually being affected by this in a negative way. i mean, you can tell in the first 2 seconds whether to take the mix seriously or not. and if its a joke, well, we lost those 2 seconds.
i guess a dark side to this movement is that you don't even have to $500-believe in yourself to create, that right now you can $0-believe in yourself and publish. but i think that's probably what you were saying the whole time.
i like your point about learning on the job. it makes me appreciate the music business-as-filter a little more. it also makes me wonder who's actually being affected by this in a negative way. i mean, you can tell in the first 2 seconds whether to take the mix seriously or not. and if its a joke, well, we lost those 2 seconds.
i guess a dark side to this movement is that you don't even have to $500-believe in yourself to create, that right now you can $0-believe in yourself and publish. but i think that's probably what you were saying the whole time.
as opposed to telling people to stop, we need better ways of sifting out the utter shit (of which there is a lot) from the good, and even great stuff.
it's 2007-- you'd think people would have done a better job of this. sure, mp3 bloggers play a part, as do services like last.fm and myspace, but we're still really not there yet.
so i say, don't ask people to stop participating, but find a better way to find people who are actually doing shit you like. umm...anyone know any good coders?
oh yeah, and can't wait for the lcd clownsystem rmx!
it's 2007-- you'd think people would have done a better job of this. sure, mp3 bloggers play a part, as do services like last.fm and myspace, but we're still really not there yet.
so i say, don't ask people to stop participating, but find a better way to find people who are actually doing shit you like. umm...anyone know any good coders?
oh yeah, and can't wait for the lcd clownsystem rmx!
sorry to post this in comments, but i couldn't find a contact email...
i've a new remix single - bizzy bone vs. six finger satellite
plus nas vs. funkstorung on the b-side
http://tago-mago.net/music3.htm
hope you dig it
---------------
Sasha Frere-Jones of "The New Yorker" featured these is his blog:
http://www.sashafrerejones.com/2007/03/plastic_orange_depression.html
----------------
"Your Standard Life" said:
"features the word motherfucker a lot."
http://www.yourstandardlife.com/2007/03/tagomago.html
i've a new remix single - bizzy bone vs. six finger satellite
plus nas vs. funkstorung on the b-side
http://tago-mago.net/music3.htm
hope you dig it
---------------
Sasha Frere-Jones of "The New Yorker" featured these is his blog:
http://www.sashafrerejones.com/2007/03/plastic_orange_depression.html
----------------
"Your Standard Life" said:
"features the word motherfucker a lot."
http://www.yourstandardlife.com/2007/03/tagomago.html
The simpliest way to reduce the glut of remixes you need to hear is to filter through the remixes that are actually pressed on vinyls. In this way, we know the remixer had access to the individual FLAC tracks instead of sampling a portion of the original off of some streaming broadcast that happen to have the unreleased track. My favorite remixes are usually the ones that isolate a single element from the original and build an entire new ridiculous song around it.
I wanna hear more about your reaction to the "My Love"/"Someone Great" blend. Which song did it destroy for you?
Post a Comment
<< Home
